[sudo-workers] Re: pam.c version 1.42 vs 1.43

[Aaron Spangler]

On Fri, 22 Oct 2004 10:43:21 -0700, Tom Lieuallen <toml at engr.orst.edu> wrote:
> I take that back.  1.42 didn't fix it either.  I swear it did at one
> point.
> 
> It appears this problem existed back in 1.6.7p5 as well.  It rather
> appears to be an issue on our HP LDAP clients.
> 
> sorry for the misleading previous message.
> 
> I guess for now, I just won't get insulted.  At least it works
> otherwise.
> 
> thanks
> 
> Tom Lieuallen
> Oregon State University
> 
> On Fri, 2004-10-22 at 10:37, Tom Lieuallen wrote:
> > I found in the sudo-workers archive a note about 'ldap and password'
> > dated Fri Aug 20 09:16:53 MDT 2004.
> >
> > I am running HP-UX 11.11 (11i) with LDAP and shadow passwords.  With the
> > pam.c released with sudo-1.6.8p1 (pam.c 1.43), I had problems.  When I
> > reverted to 1.42, it works as expected.
> >
> > Specifically, when I ran sudo with pam.c 1.43, it would accept a correct
> > password fine.  However, if I gave it a bad password, it reports the
> > following and exits the program.  No further password attempts.
> >
> >   sudo: pam_authenticate: No account present for user
> >
> > And even worse, I don't get insulted. :-)
> >
> > It seems that 1.43 needs some more work.
> >
> > Thank you
> >
> > Tom Lieuallen
> > Oregon State University
> 
> ____________________________________________________________
> sudo-workers mailing list <sudo-workers at sudo.ws>
> For list information, options, or to unsubscribe, visit:
> http://www.sudo.ws/mailman/listinfo/sudo-workers
>