[sudo-workers] Re: pam.c version 1.42 vs 1.43
aaron777 at gmail.com
Sat Oct 23 20:58:37 EDT 2004
On Fri, 22 Oct 2004 10:43:21 -0700, Tom Lieuallen <toml at engr.orst.edu> wrote:
> I take that back. 1.42 didn't fix it either. I swear it did at one
> It appears this problem existed back in 1.6.7p5 as well. It rather
> appears to be an issue on our HP LDAP clients.
> sorry for the misleading previous message.
> I guess for now, I just won't get insulted. At least it works
> Tom Lieuallen
> Oregon State University
> On Fri, 2004-10-22 at 10:37, Tom Lieuallen wrote:
> > I found in the sudo-workers archive a note about 'ldap and password'
> > dated Fri Aug 20 09:16:53 MDT 2004.
> > I am running HP-UX 11.11 (11i) with LDAP and shadow passwords. With the
> > pam.c released with sudo-1.6.8p1 (pam.c 1.43), I had problems. When I
> > reverted to 1.42, it works as expected.
> > Specifically, when I ran sudo with pam.c 1.43, it would accept a correct
> > password fine. However, if I gave it a bad password, it reports the
> > following and exits the program. No further password attempts.
> > sudo: pam_authenticate: No account present for user
> > And even worse, I don't get insulted. :-)
> > It seems that 1.43 needs some more work.
> > Thank you
> > Tom Lieuallen
> > Oregon State University
> sudo-workers mailing list <sudo-workers at sudo.ws>
> For list information, options, or to unsubscribe, visit:
More information about the sudo-workers