[sudo-workers] [patch] to add support for BSM audit records

[Christian Peron]

On Sat, Nov 29, 2008 at 03:08:46PM +0000, Robert Watson wrote:
[..]
> 
> Hi Christian:
> 
> This sounds extremely useful.  Question: do you think it might be useful to 
> add the command line being requested to the audit record via another text 
> token?  While presumably each execve(2) can be separately audited, the 
> original formulation (especially if it involves a pipeline) may be useful.
> 

Yes, I was thinking about that. It probably makes sense to use the argv
token type.  I will update the patch.